Skip to main content

Goodhart's Law in health and wellness

 Walking past the beautiful Bank of England building one day, I was reminded of a curious principle named after Charles Goodhart, a former advisor to the Bank of England. In 1975, he formulated a rule now known as Goodhart's Law: "Any observed statistical regularity tends to break down once pressure is applied to it for control purposes." In essence, when we set a target to achieve a certain metric, the old patterns that once made that metric meaningful stop working. Simply put, "when a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure."

 

 
✅Epigenetic age: When we replace hard endpoints in research with biomarkers, we risk making critical errors. For example, epigenetic age can be reduced by taking vitamin D, growth hormone, folate (B9), B12, and consuming certain foods (like poultry). However, none of these interventions reduce mortality or extend lifespan.
 
✅The Vitamin D paradox: High levels of vitamin D in the blood are strongly linked to lower risks of various diseases—cancer, autoimmune disorders, obesity, and diabetes—according to numerous studies. The quality of this research is beyond doubt. However, taking vitamin D supplements above normal levels proves almost useless. Why? Vitamin D levels are a reflection of how much time someone spends outdoors, which correlates with being more physically active, socially engaged, and overall healthier (versus being stuck indoors). Plus, there are other compounds produced under sunlight that supplements can't replace (more than a dozen, from nitric oxide to proopiomelanocortin). This doesn’t just apply to vitamin D, but to many other markers, from homocysteine to zinc.
 
✅Weight loss. Many people make weight reduction their primary goal, tracking progress solely by the number on the scale. This often leads to unhealthy practices like extreme diets or loss of muscle mass instead of fat. In the end, the pursuit of their goal leads to burnout and eventual weight gain. The more they lose, the closer they get to failure.
 
It’s like trying to evaluate a car’s condition based solely on mileage (which can easily be tampered with), assessing love by the number of gifts exchanged, or judging children based on their grades. Goodhart’s Law applies to society as well. If businesses are rewarded based on the weight of their production, products become heavier. If transportation companies are judged by kilometers traveled, routes become more complicated. If education is measured by test scores, the entire system bends toward teaching to the test. 
 
😬When company rankings or performance metrics become the focus, efforts shift toward manipulating those numbers at any cost. In some cases, countries—like Belarus—falsify economic data or infant mortality rates just to climb higher in UN rankings. The same is true for academic metrics: when citations become the benchmark, the quality of research declines, and the number of low-quality papers skyrockets.
 
👁️Metrics are useful, but they should guide us, not be our ultimate goals. It's always important to focus on real, meaningful outcomes. When setting goals or evaluating progress, it's crucial to keep Goodhart’s Law in mind, so we don’t lose sight of what really matters.

Popular posts from this blog

Respect for reality as a duty of a true gentleman

  What we “see” is a mixture of two completely different streams of information — a top-down and a bottom-up one. One comes from sensory organs, the other from our expectations — and they can blend in the most bizarre ways. When reality is very bad, when there is neither strength nor desire to engage with it, and there is a desperate longing and expectation for improvement and hope — then we begin to go blind. We stop seeing reality and start seeing our own desires, taking what is wished for as what is real. This self-deception effect is well described in the writings of people who survived concentration camps (both Nazi and Soviet). Prisoners begin to believe that the guards actually sympathize with them and are completely on their side — only secretly. Their brain, like Skinner’s pigeon, begins to interpret the most ordinary gestures and words as hidden codes of support and sympathy. And the cruelty of the guards is interpreted by these prisoners as a form of disgui...

How social status affects health and longevity

Social Status: The Numbers Tell the Story Social status — a person’s position in society — is one of the most powerful and least discussed determinants of health and lifespan. The data are unambiguous and span every domain of achievement: Olympic champions live 2.8–3 years longer than other Olympic participants. Nobel laureates live 1.4–2 years longer than scientists who were merely nominated but did not receive the prize, and 6–8 years longer than the average scientist. Academy Award winners live 4 years longer than other professional actors. Among academics, holders of doctoral degrees outlive candidates, and candidates outlive those without advanced degrees.  These are not comparisons between healthy and unhealthy people, or between rich and poor people. They are comparisons within elite populations — people with access, education, and resources — where the single varying factor is rank . The conclusion is unavoidable: status itself changes biology. Status Anxiety...